Reconstructive Authority Model: Runtime Execution Validity Under Partial Observability
Source: arXiv cs.CR
Published: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Summary
arXiv:2604.22898v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Autonomous systems increasingly operate under partial observability where execution-relevant state is never fully accessible. Existing governance mechanisms -- trusted execution environments, oracle-signed state proofs, cryptographic attestation -- enforce the integrity of computation and state projections. We show this is structurally insufficient: an authenticated projection of state is necessary but never sufficient for execution validity.
We introduce the Reconstructive Authority Model (RAM), which separates integrity from coverage. RAM defines a reconstruction gate that reasons over an explicit coverage envelope -- comprising proven state, declared assumptions, and an acknowledged unobservable residual -- and permits execution only when coverage is adequate for the action class. When coverage is insufficient, RAM narrows privileges dynamically or fails closed. Attestation proves trust in measurement; RAM proves adequacy of what is measured.
We formalize RAM, prove necessity via two theorems (attestation insufficiency and RAM necessity) and three corollaries, and present a hybrid RAM+Attestation architecture with privilege-na
Sources
Lyrie Verdict
Lyrie's autonomous defense layer flags this class of exposure the moment it surfaces — no signature update required.